🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.